Opinion
No. 3D21-2440.
11-30-2022
Anthony V. Falzon, P.A., and Anthony V. Falzon , for appellant. Greenberg Traurig, P.A., and Brigid F. Cech Samole , and Paul B. Ranis (Fort Lauderdale); Greenberg Traurig, LLP, and Katherine M. Clemente (New York, NY), for appellees. Before SCALES, LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ.
Anthony V. Falzon, P.A., and Anthony V. Falzon , for appellant.
Greenberg Traurig, P.A., and Brigid F. Cech Samole , and Paul B. Ranis (Fort Lauderdale); Greenberg Traurig, LLP, and Katherine M. Clemente (New York, NY), for appellees.
Before SCALES, LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See MetroPCS Commc'ns, Inc. v. Porter, 273 So.3d 1025, 1027 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) ("We review the record for substantial, competent evidence to support the trial court's findings of fact and consider de novo its conclusions of law."); see also Ferrara v. Luxottica Retail, N. Am., Inc., 8:17-CV-2914-T-33AEP, 2018 WL 573430, at *2-3 (M.D. Fla. Jan 26, 2018) (holding that an electronic signature is valid to enforce an agreement to arbitrate); Santos v. Gen. Dynamics Aviation Servs. Corp., 984 So.2d 658, 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (holding that an employee's continued employment after receipt of an arbitration policy demonstrates his assent to its arbitration terms).