Opinion
04-27-2016
Denise JEAN–PIERRE, appellant, v. Sarah Ok PARK, et al., respondents.
William Pager, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant. Tromello, McDonnell & Kehoe, Melville, N.Y. (Stephen J. Donnelly, Jr., of counsel), for respondents.
William Pager, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant.
Tromello, McDonnell & Kehoe, Melville, N.Y. (Stephen J. Donnelly, Jr., of counsel), for respondents.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lebowitz, J.), entered November 20, 2013, as granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that she did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) as a result of the subject accident.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The defendants met their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v. Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 N.Y.2d 345, 746 N.Y.S.2d 865, 774 N.E.2d 1197; Gaddy v. Eyler, 79 N.Y.2d 955, 956–957, 582 N.Y.S.2d 990, 591 N.E.2d 1176). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324, 508 N.Y.S.2d 923, 501 N.E.2d 572). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) as a result of the subject accident.
In light of our determination, we need not address the defendants' remaining contentions.
MASTRO, J.P., LEVENTHAL, SGROI and MILLER, JJ., concur.