Opinion
519469.
04-16-2015
In the Matter of JD STATION PLAZA REALTY INC., Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Jeffrey Schwartz, New Rochelle, for appellant. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Steven Koton of counsel), for respondent.
Jeffrey Schwartz, New Rochelle, for appellant.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Steven Koton of counsel), for respondent.
Before: LAHTINEN, J.P., McCARTHY, EGAN JR. and CLARK, JJ.
Opinion
LAHTINEN, J.P.Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 3, 2014, which assessed JD Station Plaza Realty Inc. for additional unemployment insurance contributions.
Following an audit, JD Station Plaza Realty Inc. was assessed $1,519.18 in unemployment insurance contributions based upon remuneration it paid to John DeRaffele, its sole shareholder and president. Because JD Station is a subchapter S corporation, its net income during the period in question passed through to DeRaffele, who reported it on his personal income tax returns (see 26 U.S.C. § 1366 ). The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board accordingly found that JD Station was liable for additional unemployment insurance contributions, and JD Station now appeals.
We affirm. “Any employer shall become liable for contributions under this article if he [or she] has paid remuneration of [$300] or more in any calendar quarter” (Labor Law § 560[1] ). Remuneration, in turn, “is defined to include ‘every form of compensation for employment paid by an employer to his [or her] employee’ ” (Matter
of Chernavsky [Commissioner of Labor], 76 A.D.3d 739, 740, 905 N.Y.S.2d 525 [2010], quoting Labor Law § 517[1] ). DeRaffele was not paid a salary despite performing services for JD Station, but nevertheless received the net income from the corporation. Substantial evidence thus supports the Board's finding that “the corporation's [s]ubchapter S net income was ... remuneration,” notwithstanding DeRaffele's contention that he invested most of that income back into JD Station (Matter of Ellenbogen Computer Servs. [Hudacs], 202 A.D.2d 825, 826, 609 N.Y.S.2d 384 [1994] ; see Matter of R.S. Smero, Inc. [Levine], 51 A.D.2d 273, 276, 381 N.Y.S.2d 337 [1976] ; see also Matter of Preferred Computer Trading Corp. [Hartnett], 173 A.D.2d 1031, 1031–1032, 570 N.Y.S.2d 368 [1991] ).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
McCARTHY, EGAN JR. and CLARK, JJ., concur.