From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

JCD Farms, Inc. v. Juul-Nielsen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 16, 2002
300 A.D.2d 446 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2002-01026

Submitted November 18, 2002.

December 16, 2002.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Warshawsky, J.), entered January 11, 2002, as granted that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to substitute JCD Farms, Inc., as the party plaintiff in the action, and denied those branches of their cross motion which were for leave to amend their answers to include the defense of lack of capacity to sue, and to dismiss the complaint.

Charles X. Connick, PLLC, Mineola, N.Y. (Glenn P. McNamee of counsel), for appellants.

Vernon Ginsburg, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Michael T. Yonker of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., SANDRA L. TOWNES, STEPHEN G. CRANE, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to substitute JCD Farms, Inc., as the party plaintiff in this action, in the place of the original plaintiff, James Kirvin III (see CPLR 1003; 3025[b]). "'It is well settled that an amendment which would shift a claim from a party without standing to another party who could have asserted that claim in the first instance is proper since such an amendment, by its nature, does not result in surprise or prejudice to the defendants who had prior knowledge of the claim and an opportunity to prepare a proper defense'" (New York State Thruway Auth. v. CBE Contr. Corp., 280 A.D.2d 390, quoting MK W. St. Co. v. Meridien Hotels, 184 A.D.2d 312, 313-314; see Frankart Furniture Staten Is. v. Forest Mall Assocs., 159 A.D.2d 322, 323; Bellini v. Gersalle Realty Corp., 120 A.D.2d 345, 347). The defendants did not show that they would suffer any prejudice if the amendment was granted (see Frankart Furniture Staten Is. v. Forest Mall Assocs., supra).

The defendants' remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

SANTUCCI, J.P., TOWNES, CRANE and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

JCD Farms, Inc. v. Juul-Nielsen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 16, 2002
300 A.D.2d 446 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

JCD Farms, Inc. v. Juul-Nielsen

Case Details

Full title:JCD FARMS, INC., respondent, v. CARL E. JUUL-NIELSEN, ET AL., appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 16, 2002

Citations

300 A.D.2d 446 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
751 N.Y.S.2d 421

Citing Cases

D'Angelo v. Kujawski

"Whether to grant such leave is within the ... court's discretion, the exercise of which will not be lightly…

United Fairness, Inc. v. Town of Woodbury

rejudice or surprise to the opposing party, unless the proposed amendment is palpably insufficient or…