From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

J.C. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 6, 2009
1 So. 3d 1196 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. 5D08-2963.

February 6, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Osceola County, Sally D.M. Kest, J.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Robert E. Wildridge, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carlos A. Ivanor, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


J.C. appeals the trial court's restitution order. She contends that the trial court erred by conducting the restitution hearing in her absence. We agree and reverse.

A defendant has the constitutional right to be present at all stages of a criminal proceeding, including a restitution hearing. Coney v. State, 653 So.2d 1009, 1013 (Fla. 1995). "[U]nless the State can show that a defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to be present at his restitution hearing, it is error to proceed in his absence." Baker v. State, 979 So.2d 453, 455 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). A defendant's waiver of the right to be present may be express, or it may be implied from the defendant's voluntary absence Capuzzo v. State, 596 So.2d 438, 439-40 (Fla. 1992). In order for a defendant to voluntarily absent himself from a hearing, a defendant must have had notice of the hearing and intentionally avoided it or left the Court during the proceeding. Id. at 440.

Here, no competent substantial evidence exists to show that J.C. voluntarily absented herself from the restitution hearing. The record does not reflect that J.C. received notice the first time the hearing was set. The second time the hearing was set, J.C. was in custody in an adjacent county and no transport order was issued. The last time the hearing was set, J.C. was in a residential drug treatment program. While these delays crowded the court's docket and unnecessarily wasted valuable court time, we cannot conclude that J.C.'s absence was voluntary or an intentional waiver of her right to be present.

Accordingly, we reverse the restitution order and remand for a new hearing.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

J.C. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 6, 2009
1 So. 3d 1196 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

J.C. v. State

Case Details

Full title:J.C., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Feb 6, 2009

Citations

1 So. 3d 1196 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Citing Cases

Elmer v. State

Elmer argues, and the State agrees, that the trial court reversibly erred by conducting a restitution hearing…

C.A.M. v. State

Because Appellant, a juvenile, was not present for the first session of a two-part restitution hearing, and…