Opinion
OP 02-01186
November 15, 2002.
Original proceeding pursuant to section 207 of the Eminent Domain Procedure Law challenging the findings and determination of respondent City of Syracuse Industrial Development Agency.
HARTER, SECREST EMERY LLP, ROCHESTER (EDWARD F. PREMO, II, OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER.
HISCOCK BARCLAY SAPERSTON DAY, BUFFALO (MARK R. McNAMARA OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT CITY OF SYRACUSE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY.
ROSENBERG ESTIS, P.C., NEW YORK (GARY M. ROSENBERG OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS THE PYRAMID COMPANIES AND CAROUSEL CENTER COMPANY, L.P.
PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., HAYES, KEHOE, BURNS, AND LAWTON, JJ.
OPINION AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the determination be and the same hereby is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.
Same Opinion by Pigott, Jr., J.P., as in Matter of Kaufmann's Carousel v. City of Syracuse Indus. Dev. Agency ( 301 A.D.2d 292 [Nov. 15, 2002]).