Opinion
No. 06-P-1704.
June 10, 2008.
Decisions Pursuant to Rule 1:28.
So much of the "order of contempt" dated May 3, 2005, on complaints filed February 28, 2003, and June 24, 2003, and the corrected judgment of contempt dated June 1, 2005, nunc pro tunc as of May 3, 2005, on complaints for contempt filed May 13, 2003, and June 24, 2003, as (1) order that the husband's child support arrearage be "zero[ed] out," (2) relieve the husband of his obligation to pay the balance on the credit card debt and the Sears bill, (3) direct the wife to pay the husband's legal fees and costs in the amount of $7,000, and (4) determine that the husband is not in contempt of any child support arrearage, are vacated and the matters are remanded to the Probate and Family Court for further proceedings consistent with the memorandum and order of the Appeals Court. In all other respects, the order of contempt and the corrected judgment are affirmed. So much of the judgment of contempt dated May 3, 2005, on the complaint for contempt filed February 2, 2005, as finds the husband not guilty of contempt, is vacated and the matter is remanded to the Probate and Family Court for further proceedings consistent with the memorandum and order of the Appeals Court. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.