From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jayanama v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 11, 2023
No. 23818-21 (U.S.T.C. Jan. 11, 2023)

Opinion

23818-21

01-11-2023

CHATTANAT JAYANAMA, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Kathleen Kerrigan, Chief Judge.

On November 16, 2021, respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Although petitioner was directed to file an objection, if any, to the motion, no response was received.

The Tax Court is a court of limited jurisdiction, and we may exercise that jurisdiction only to the extent authorized by Congress. Naftel v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 527, 529 (1985). The Court has no authority to extend the deadline for filing a petition in response to a notice of deficiency. See Hallmark Research Collective v. Commissioner, No. 21284-21, 159 T.C. (Nov. 29, 2022). Thus, upon due consideration of the record of this case and for the reasons set forth in respondent's motion, it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion is granted, and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Jayanama v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 11, 2023
No. 23818-21 (U.S.T.C. Jan. 11, 2023)
Case details for

Jayanama v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:CHATTANAT JAYANAMA, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jan 11, 2023

Citations

No. 23818-21 (U.S.T.C. Jan. 11, 2023)