From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jasso v. Wells Fargo Bank

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 17, 2023
2:20-cv-00858-CDS-BNW (D. Nev. Feb. 17, 2023)

Opinion

2:20-cv-00858-CDS-BNW

02-17-2023

MAURICIO JASSO, individually and in his capacity as the Court-Appointed Receiver of JAMA INVESTMENT GROUP, INC., GUILLERMO SESMA, SYLVIA MARTINEZ SALINAS, BELISARIO JASSO BALDINI, JAVIER RAMIREZ LARES, ANTONIO BACHALANI, RODRIGO FERNANDEZ, JUAN ROMERO, and BERNARDO VILLACECIAS, Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., KATHERINE DARRALL, and JOSE RICO, Defendants.

Jeffrey Willis Erica J. Stutman Gregory Marshall (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Hayley J. Cummings Jacob C. Jones (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. Attorneys for Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Katherine Darrall Mark J. Connot Rex D. Garner FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP One Summerlin Attorneys for Defendant Jose Rico Anthony P. Sgro Colleen N. Savage SGRO & ROGER Courtney Caprio Jeffrey W. Gutchess Joanna Niworoski AXS LAW GROUP, PLLC Attorneys for Plaintiffs


Jeffrey Willis

Erica J. Stutman

Gregory Marshall (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

Hayley J. Cummings

Jacob C. Jones (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.

Attorneys for Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Katherine Darrall

Mark J. Connot

Rex D. Garner

FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP

One Summerlin

Attorneys for Defendant Jose Rico

Anthony P. Sgro

Colleen N. Savage

SGRO & ROGER

Courtney Caprio

Jeffrey W. Gutchess

Joanna Niworoski

AXS LAW GROUP, PLLC

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. AND KATHERINE DARRALL'S MOTION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME ON DEFENDANTS WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. AND KATHERINE DARRALL'S MOTION TO EXTEND REMAINING DEADLINES IN CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

BRENDA WEKSLER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 7(b) and Local Rule IA 6-1 for the District of Nevada, Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Katherine Darrall (together, ‘Defendants”) respectfully request an Order Shortening Time to hear their Motion to Extend Remaining Deadlines in Case Management Plan, filed today at ECF No. 336 (“Motion”). This Request is based upon the pleadings and papers on file herein, the Declaration of Erica Stutman attached as Exhibit 1, and the points and authorities submitted herewith.

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

In their Motion, Defendants respectfully request that the Court extend the March 10, 2023 deadline for Defendants to serve their expert disclosures and reports, along with the remaining expert and dispositive motion deadlines that follow. As discussed in more detail in the Motion, Defendants request an extension of this deadline because Defendants and their experts cannot reasonably meet the March 10 deadline despite their diligence. This is because Plaintiffs disclosed two expert reports, one of which is a massive, 1,150 page expert report, which includes 433 pages of text with opinions, and 717 pages of exhibits, nearly all of which were created by Plaintiffs' experts. In addition, Plaintiffs recently made supplemental document productions to Defendants, despite such productions being very long overdue, and have further warned of another document production to come. Defendants did not and could not have reasonably anticipated such a massive production of expert opinion evidence and documents when agreeing to the original expert disclosure schedule, which provided a mere forty (40) days for Defendants to provide responsive expert opinions.

An order shortening time to decide Defendants' Motion is necessary because if filed in the normal course, Plaintiffs' deadline to respond to the Motion will not be until March 2, 2023, with Defendants' reply due on March 9, 2023, leaving no time for the Court to consider the briefing and enter a ruling within a meaningful period before the March 10, 2023 deadline.

Defendants' Motion is reasonable and would typically be agreed upon by stipulation between the parties without any dispute and without involving the Court. The other defendant, Jose Rico, does not plan to oppose Defendants' Motion. However, Plaintiffs have stated they will contest Defendants' Motion.

Accordingly, Defendants seek an order from the Court shortening the briefing period on the Motion. Wells Fargo proposes a response period of three business days and a reply period of two business days.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that ECF No. 337 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' response to ECF No. 336 is due by 2/21/2023. No reply will be considered.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

INDEX OF EXHIBITS TO WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. AND KATHERINE DARRALL'S MOTION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME ON DEFENDANTS WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. AND KATHERINE DARRALL'S MOTION TO EXTEND REMAINING DEADLINES IN CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

EXHIBIT

DESCRIPTION

NO. OF PAGES

1

Declaration of Erica Stutman, Esq. in Support of Wells Fargo 2 Bank, N.A. and Katherine Darrall's Motion for Order Shortening Time On Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Katherine Darrall's Motion to Extend Remaining Deadlines in Case Management Plan

2


Summaries of

Jasso v. Wells Fargo Bank

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 17, 2023
2:20-cv-00858-CDS-BNW (D. Nev. Feb. 17, 2023)
Case details for

Jasso v. Wells Fargo Bank

Case Details

Full title:MAURICIO JASSO, individually and in his capacity as the Court-Appointed…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Feb 17, 2023

Citations

2:20-cv-00858-CDS-BNW (D. Nev. Feb. 17, 2023)