From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jasper v. Hussain

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Jan 9, 2014
843 N.W.2d 476 (Iowa Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 13–0120.

2014-01-9

Kimberly S. JASPER, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Zakia HUSSAIN and International Fashions & Gifts, Inc., Defendants–Appellants.


Because there are no aggravating factors here, the court's holding to the contrary means that establishing a fraudulent conveyance, in and of itself, is sufficient to support an award of punitive damages. While some courts have reached the conclusion that proving fraud, without more, is sufficient to support an award of punitive damages, see John J. Kircher & Christine Wiseman, 2 Punitive Damages: Law and Practice § 19:19 (2d ed.2013) (summarizing cases), this is not our law as articulated in Benson. Because there are no aggravating factors, because the transfer prejudiced Jasper nominally, if at all, and because the proceeds from the transferred property were used to satisfy other creditors, I disagree that this transfer represents “willful and wanton disregard” for Jasper's rights.


Summaries of

Jasper v. Hussain

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Jan 9, 2014
843 N.W.2d 476 (Iowa Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Jasper v. Hussain

Case Details

Full title:Kimberly S. JASPER, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Zakia HUSSAIN and International…

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: Jan 9, 2014

Citations

843 N.W.2d 476 (Iowa Ct. App. 2014)