From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jasmine W.-S. v. Malcolm H.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 17, 2022
202 A.D.3d 582 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

15325 Dkt. No. 20741-19/19A Case No. 2021–00763

02-17-2022

In the Matter of JASMINE W.-S., Petitioner–Respondent, v. MALCOLM H., Respondent–Appellant.

The Law Offices of Salihah R. Denman, PLLC, New York (Salihah R. Denman of counsel), for appellant.


The Law Offices of Salihah R. Denman, PLLC, New York (Salihah R. Denman of counsel), for appellant.

Manzanet–Daniels, J.P., Gische, Mazzarelli, Friedman, Mendez, JJ.

Appeal from order, Family Court, Bronx County (Denetra M. Thompson, Support Magistrate), entered on or about October 26, 2020, which granted the petition for a modification of an order of support to increase the father's child support payments to $270.16 weekly and to provide for a pro rata sharing of the child's unreimbursed medical expenses, deemed an appeal from order, same court (Leticia M. Ramirez, J.), entered on or about December 22, 2020, which denied the father's objections, and as so considered, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Application by respondent father's assigned counsel to withdraw is granted (see Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 [1967] ; People v. Saunders, 52 A.D.2d 833, 384 N.Y.S.2d 161 [1st Dept. 1976] ). A review of the record, as well as the father's pro se supplemental brief, demonstrate that there are no nonfrivolous issues that could be raised on appeal.


Summaries of

Jasmine W.-S. v. Malcolm H.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 17, 2022
202 A.D.3d 582 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

Jasmine W.-S. v. Malcolm H.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JASMINE W.-S., Petitioner–Respondent, v. MALCOLM H.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 17, 2022

Citations

202 A.D.3d 582 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
159 N.Y.S.3d 676