From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jarvis v. Lavine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 31, 1922
200 App. Div. 552 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)

Opinion

March 31, 1922.

Morris Grossman, for the appellant.

No appearance for respondent.

Present — DOWLING, LAUGHLIN, SMITH, MERRELL and GREENBAUM, JJ.


Rule 45 of the Rules of Civil Practice requires the summons to be in substantially the form therein provided. We think the form of the summons provided by section 418 of the Code of Civil Procedure is a substantial compliance with the provisions of said rule, and the court obtains jurisdiction by the service of the summons in the old form.

The order appealed from is, therefore, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

Jarvis v. Lavine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 31, 1922
200 App. Div. 552 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)
Case details for

Jarvis v. Lavine

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN JARVIS, Respondent, v . JOSEPH G. LAVINE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 31, 1922

Citations

200 App. Div. 552 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)
193 N.Y.S. 331

Citing Cases

Ceas v. Pease

In my opinion the defect is not jurisdictional and is not such a defect or error which affects the merits. (…