From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jarvis v. Astrue

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 23, 2008
282 F. App'x 259 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-1994.

Submitted: June 19, 2008.

Decided: June 23, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:05-cv-02950-CCB).

Phillip R. Kete, General Counsel, AFGE Local 1923, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Larry D. Adams, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Reginald E. Jarvis appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's summary judgment motion on his race discrimination claim, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jarvis v. Astrue, No. 1:05-cv-02950-CCB, 2007 WL 2332694 (D.Md. July 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Jarvis v. Astrue

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 23, 2008
282 F. App'x 259 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Jarvis v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:Reginald E. JARVIS, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 23, 2008

Citations

282 F. App'x 259 (4th Cir. 2008)