From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jarrow v. Preciado

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Aug 9, 2023
2:21-CV-200-Z-BR (N.D. Tex. Aug. 9, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-CV-200-Z-BR

08-09-2023

MICHAEL JARROW, Plaintiff, v. JOE B. PRECIADO, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CIVIL RIGHTS CLAIM

MATTHEW J. KACSMARYK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Before the Court are the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge to dismiss the civil rights complaint filed by Plaintiff ECF No. 10. No objections to the findings, conclusions, and recommendation have been filed. After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, the Court concludes that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct. It is therefore ORDERED that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED and the case is DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jarrow v. Preciado

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Aug 9, 2023
2:21-CV-200-Z-BR (N.D. Tex. Aug. 9, 2023)
Case details for

Jarrow v. Preciado

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL JARROW, Plaintiff, v. JOE B. PRECIADO, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Aug 9, 2023

Citations

2:21-CV-200-Z-BR (N.D. Tex. Aug. 9, 2023)