From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jarrett v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 9, 2003
301 A.D.2d 391 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2769N

January 9, 2003.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered on or about August 15, 2001, which denied plaintiff's motion to, inter alia, restore this action to active status, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted to the extent of restoring the matter to the active pre-note of issue calendar, and the matter remanded for further proceedings.

Philip D. Marin, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Ronald E. Sternberg, for Defendants-Respondents.

Buckley, J.P., Ellerin, Lerner, Friedman, Marlow, JJ.


As conceded by defendant, the motion court erred in denying plaintiff's motion to restore the action to active status. Since no note of issue had been filed, the court had no authority to dismiss the action pursuant to CPLR 3404 and plaintiff's motion to restore the case to active status should have been granted (Jiles v. New York City Tr. Auth., 290 A.D.2d 307; see also Pearl v. City of New York, 293 A.D.2d 406;Koutsoupakis v. City of New York, 292 A.D.2d 191; Johnson v. Sam Minskoff Sons, 287 A.D.2d 233).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Jarrett v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 9, 2003
301 A.D.2d 391 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Jarrett v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD JARRETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 9, 2003

Citations

301 A.D.2d 391 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
752 N.Y.S.2d 860