From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jarrett v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA ELKINS
Feb 28, 2012
Civil Action No. 2:11-CV-83 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 28, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:11-CV-83

02-28-2012

ROGER L. JARRETT, JR., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


(Judge Bailey)


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION/OPINION

On this day, the above-styled matter came before this Court for consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David J. Joel [Doc. 14] dated February 7, 2012, to which neither party filed objections. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court is required to make a de novo review of those portions of the magistrate judge's findings to which objection is made. However, failure to file objections to the magistrate judge's proposed findings and recommendation permits the District Court to review the recommendation under the standards that the District Court believes are appropriate, and under these circumstances, the parties' right to de novo review is waived. See Webb v. Califano, 468 F. Supp. 825 (E.D. Cal. 1979). The Court notes service was accepted on February 8, 2012. See Doc. 15. Accordingly, because no objections have been filed, this report and recommendation ("R & R") will be reviewed for clear error.

On January 23, 2012, Magistrate Judge Joel issued an Order to Show Cause [Doc. 12] wherein the plaintiff was cautioned that a failure to show cause within fourteen (14) days could result in dismissal of this case. The plaintiff has to date failed to answer or otherwise respond. For those reasons, the Report and Recommendation recommends this matter now be dismissed.

Upon review of the above, it is the opinion of this Court that the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 14] should be, and is, hereby ORDERED ADOPTED. For the reasons more fully stated in the Report and Recommendation, this Court ORDERS that this matter be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and be STRICKEN FROM THE DOCKET OF THIS COURT for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to mail a copy to the pro se plaintiff.

___________________________

JOHN PRESTON BAILEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Jarrett v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA ELKINS
Feb 28, 2012
Civil Action No. 2:11-CV-83 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Jarrett v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ROGER L. JARRETT, JR., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA ELKINS

Date published: Feb 28, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:11-CV-83 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 28, 2012)