From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jarrat v. AT&T Mobility LLC

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 31, 2021
2:21-cv-01298-MCE-KJN (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01298-MCE-KJN

08-31-2021

CASEY JARRAT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. AT&T MOBILITY LLC, Defendant.

MAYER BROWN LLP ARCHIS A. PARASHARAMI ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT AT&T MOBILITY LLC


Action Filed: June 8, 2021

Removal Dated: July 22, 2021

MAYER BROWN LLP ARCHIS A. PARASHARAMI ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT AT&T MOBILITY LLC

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

HON. MORRISON C. ENGLAND JUDGE

WHEREAS, the Court, having considered the Parties' Stipulation for an Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint (“Stipulation”), as well as the record and proceedings to date in the above captioned action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation is GRANTED IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's deadline to file its motion to compel arbitration shall be extended 14 days, to and including September 9, 2021.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jarrat v. AT&T Mobility LLC

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 31, 2021
2:21-cv-01298-MCE-KJN (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2021)
Case details for

Jarrat v. AT&T Mobility LLC

Case Details

Full title:CASEY JARRAT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 31, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-01298-MCE-KJN (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2021)