From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jarosz v. Dinapoli

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 10, 2012
95 A.D.3d 1500 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-05-10

In the Matter of Alexander JAROSZ, Petitioner, v. Thomas P. DiNAPOLI, as State Comptroller, Respondent.

Bartlett, McDonough & Monaghan, White Plains (Ryan K. Allen of counsel), for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Frank K. Walsh of counsel), for respondent.



Bartlett, McDonough & Monaghan, White Plains (Ryan K. Allen of counsel), for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Frank K. Walsh of counsel), for respondent.
Before: MERCURE, J.P., ROSE, STEIN, GARRY and EGAN JR., JJ.

STEIN, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement benefits.

Petitioner, a police officer with the City of Mount Vernon Police Department, applied for accidental disability retirement benefits after he injured his right hand and elbow during a struggle with a suspect. After a hearing, a Hearing Officer denied his application, finding that his disability was not the result of an accident pursuant to the Retirement and Social Security Law. Respondent adopted the Hearing Officer's findings and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

Petitioner's application for performance of duty disability retirement benefits was granted.

Petitioner contends that he is entitled to accidental disability retirement benefits because his injuries were the result of an assault—which is compensable under the Retirement and Social Security Law ( see Matter of Ammann v. New York State Comptroller, 13 A.D.3d 858, 858–859, 785 N.Y.S.2d 799 [2004],lv. denied5 N.Y.3d 702, 800 N.Y.S.2d 373, 833 N.E.2d 708 [2005] )—and not simply as a result of the performance of his duties as a police officer. To that end, it is petitioner's burden to demonstrate that his injuries resulted from an accident, meaning“that they were caused by a sudden and extraordinary event that is unrelated to the ordinary risks of employment” (Matter of Held v. DiNapoli, 82 A.D.3d 1444, 1445, 918 N.Y.S.2d 747 [2011] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted] ). Here, the record establishes that petitioner reported to the police physician that he was injured when he tackled a suspect to the ground while attempting to place him under arrest. Because such evidence provides substantial evidence to support respondent's finding that petitioner was injured while engaged in a risk inherent in his normal police duties, the determination will not be disturbed ( see id.; Matter of Welsh v. New York State Comptroller, 67 A.D.3d 1167, 1168, 888 N.Y.S.2d 318 [2009],lv. denied14 N.Y.3d 706, 899 N.Y.S.2d 130, 925 N.E.2d 934 [2010] ). The fact that the record contains proof from which it could be concluded that petitioner was injured as the result of an assault does not negate the fact that there is substantial evidence supporting the finding that petitioner's injury did not stem from a compensable accident ( see Matter of Kilbride v. New York State Comptroller, 95 A.D.3d 1496, ––––, 944 N.Y.S.2d 393 [decided herewith]; Matter of Wise v. New York State Comptroller, 38 A.D.3d 1032, 1034, 831 N.Y.S.2d 571 [2007],lv. denied9 N.Y.3d 811, 844 N.Y.S.2d 787, 876 N.E.2d 516 [2007] ) inasmuchas any inconsistency in the evidence presents a credibility issue for respondent to resolve ( see Matter of Welsh v. New York State Comptroller, 67 A.D.3d at 1169, 888 N.Y.S.2d 318;Matter of Hughes v. Hevesi, 56 A.D.3d 934, 936, 867 N.Y.S.2d 264 [2008],lv. denied12 N.Y.3d 711, 882 N.Y.S.2d 397, 909 N.E.2d 1235 [2009] ).

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

MERCURE, J.P., ROSE, GARRY and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.




Summaries of

Jarosz v. Dinapoli

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 10, 2012
95 A.D.3d 1500 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Jarosz v. Dinapoli

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Alexander JAROSZ, Petitioner, v. Thomas P. DiNAPOLI, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: May 10, 2012

Citations

95 A.D.3d 1500 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
944 N.Y.S.2d 395
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 3709

Citing Cases

Fulton v. N.Y. State Comptroller

Following a hearing, a Hearing Officer concluded that the denial of benefits was proper because the incident…

Del Salto v. DiNapoli

We confirm. Petitioner bears the burden of proving that his injuries were accidental, “in that they were…