From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jardine v. Maryland Cas. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 14, 2011
Case No. 3:10-cv-03318 SC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:10-cv-03318 SC Case No. 3:10-cv-03319 SC Case No. 3:10-cv-03335 SC Case No. 3:10-cv-03336 SC

11-14-2011

JAMES JARDINE, an individual, Plaintiff, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, a corporation, and DOES 1 thorough 50, Defendants. JAMES JARDINE, an individual, Plaintiff, v. EMPLOYERS FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, and DOES 1 thorough 50, Defendants.

Brandt L. Wolkin, Esq., SBN 112220 Dawn A. Silberstein, Esq., SBN 167936 Wolkin Curran, LLP Attorneys for Defendant EMPLOYERS FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY


Brandt L. Wolkin, Esq., SBN 112220

Dawn A. Silberstein, Esq., SBN 167936

Wolkin Curran, LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

EMPLOYERS FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

STIPULATION CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES; [Proposed] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION

WHEREAS, Defendant Employers Fire Insurance Company ("Employers") has filed motions for summary judgment in both Case No. 3:10-cv-03335 SC; and Case No. 3:10-cv-03336 SC.

WHEREAS, the hearing on these motions is set for Friday, December 9, 2011.

WHERAS, the parties each wish to focus their time and attention on preparing their opposition and reply briefs to the pending motions for summary judgment.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff, James Jardine, and defendant, Employers, by and through their attorneys of record that the deadline for disclosure of expert witnesses currently set for November 23, 2011 be extended through and including, Monday, December 12, 2011.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

SCHENONE & PECK

Ronald G. Peck

Attorney for Plaintiff

JAMES JARDINE

WOLKIN • CURRAN, LLP

Brandt L. Woikin

Davra A. Silberstein

Attorneys for defendant

EMPLOYERS FIRE INSURANCE

COMPANY

WHEREAS, the hearing on these motions is set for Friday, December 9, 2011.

WHERAS, the parties each wish to focus their time and attention on preparing their opposition and reply briefs to the pending motions for summary judgment.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff, James Jardine, and defendant, Employers, by and through their attorneys of record that the deadline for disclosure of expert witnesses currently set for November 23, 2011 be extended through and including, Monday, December 12, 2011.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

SCHENONE & PECK

Ronald G. Peck

Attorney for Plaintiff

JAMES JARDINE

WOLKIN • CURRAN, LLP

Brandt L. Wolkin

Dawn A. Silberstein

Attorneys for defendant

EMPLOYERS FIRE INSURANCE

COMPANY

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES' STIPULATION, the Court finds good cause to grant the parties' request to extend the deadline for Expert Witness Disclosure from November 23, 2011 to December 12, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Samuel Conti

United States District Judge

DECLARATION OF SERVICE

I, Angela Lee Rojas, declare as follows:

I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within entitled action. I am employed at Wolkin • Curran, LLP, 555 Montgomery Street, Suite 1100, San Francisco, California 94111.

On 11 November 2011 I served the attached document, STIPULATION CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES; [Proposed] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION, on the interested parties in said action, by placing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope(s) or package(s), with delivery fees or postage fully prepaid, addressed as follows:

PLEASE SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST

and served the named document in the manner(s) indicated below:

X BY MAIL: I placed true and correct copy(ies) of the above named document(s) in sealed envelope(s) or package(s), with postage fully prepaid, addressed to the addressee(s) listed above or on the attached service list on whom service is to be made. I served the above named document(s) by placing the envelope or package for collection and mailing following our ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with this business's practice for collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service. The above named document(s) being served by mail bore a notation of the date and place of mailing and a signed copy of this affidavit or certificate of mailing accompanied the above named document(s).

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made. Executed 11 November 2011, at San Francisco, California.

Angela Lee Rojas

SERVICE LIST

Jonathan Gross, Esq.

Vivian Leung Lerche, Esq.

Bishop Barry Drath

Watergate Tower III

2000 Powell Street, Suite 1425

Emeryville, CA 94608

Tel: 510/596-0888

Fax: 510/596-0899

E-mail: jgross@bishop-barry.com

E-mail: vlerche@bishop-barry.com

Counsel for Maryland Casualty Company


Summaries of

Jardine v. Maryland Cas. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 14, 2011
Case No. 3:10-cv-03318 SC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Jardine v. Maryland Cas. Co.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES JARDINE, an individual, Plaintiff, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, a…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Nov 14, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:10-cv-03318 SC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2011)