From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jaramillo v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Jun 3, 2020
No. CV-19-08017-PCT-SPL (JFM) (D. Ariz. Jun. 3, 2020)

Opinion

No. CV-19-08017-PCT-SPL (JFM) No. CR-15-08236-PCT-SPL

06-03-2020

Kristopher Andrew Jaramillo, Petitioner, v. United States of America, Respondent.


ORDER

Movant Kristopher Andrew Jaramillo has filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ("Motion") (Doc. 1). The Honorable James F. Metcalf, United States Magistrate Judge, has issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), recommending that the Court dismiss the Motion with prejudice. Judge Metcalf advised the parties that they had fourteen (14) days to file objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections could be considered a waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R. (Doc. 24 at 4); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, 72; United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).

The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) ("[Section 636(b)(1)] does not... require any review at all... of any issue that is not the subject of an objection."); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) ("The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to."). The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is well-taken. The Court will adopt the R&R and deny the Motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate"); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) ("The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions."). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. That Magistrate Judge James F. Metcalf's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14) is accepted and adopted by the Court;

2. That the Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (CV-19-08017-PCT-SPL (JFM), Doc. 1; CR-15-08236-PCT-SPL, Doc. 45) is dismissed with prejudice;

3. That a certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are granted;

4. That the Clerk of Court shall file this Order in the underlying related criminal action, Case No. CR-15-08236-PCT-SPL; and

5. That the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly and terminate this action.

Dated this 3rd day of June, 2020.

/s/_________

Honorable Steven P. Logan

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Jaramillo v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Jun 3, 2020
No. CV-19-08017-PCT-SPL (JFM) (D. Ariz. Jun. 3, 2020)
Case details for

Jaramillo v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Kristopher Andrew Jaramillo, Petitioner, v. United States of America…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Jun 3, 2020

Citations

No. CV-19-08017-PCT-SPL (JFM) (D. Ariz. Jun. 3, 2020)

Citing Cases

Portillo-Guerrero v. United States

Every court to consider this question has held that Garza did not announce a new rule. In re Sanchez, No.…