From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jaquez v. Best Choice Prods.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 6, 2022
22-cv-2673 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 6, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-2673 (CM)

09-06-2022

RAMON JAQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. BEST CHOICE PRODUCTS, INC, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

McMahon, J.

The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled in principle, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within thirty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated.

To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed within (30) thirty days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same (30) thirty-day period to be “so ordered” by the Court. Per the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record.

Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are vacated. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jaquez v. Best Choice Prods.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 6, 2022
22-cv-2673 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Jaquez v. Best Choice Prods.

Case Details

Full title:RAMON JAQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. BEST CHOICE PRODUCTS, INC, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 6, 2022

Citations

22-cv-2673 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 6, 2022)