From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jappaya v. F.G.Y., Inc.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jan 31, 2022
969 N.W.2d 27 (Mich. 2022)

Opinion

SC: 163395 COA: 349247

01-31-2022

George JAPPAYA, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant-Appellee, v. F.G.Y., INC., a/k/a FGY Inc., Joe Karmo, Nidhal Karmo, Yousif Kalasho, and Lumia Kalasho, Defendants/Counterplaintiffs/Third-Party Defendants-Appellants, and Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation and Bank of America, Defendants/Counterplaintiffs/Third-Party Plaintiffs, and Shawn Jappaya, Jappaya Law, PLC, and Jamal Alnakshabandi, Third-Party Defendants.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 8, 2021 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

Jappaya v. F.G.Y., Inc.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jan 31, 2022
969 N.W.2d 27 (Mich. 2022)
Case details for

Jappaya v. F.G.Y., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:George JAPPAYA, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant-Appellee, v. F.G.Y., INC.…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Jan 31, 2022

Citations

969 N.W.2d 27 (Mich. 2022)