From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Janke v. Brooks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 19, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00837-REB-BNB (D. Colo. Mar. 19, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00837-REB-BNB

03-19-2012

TERRY A. JANKE, and MICHELE JANKE. Plaintiffs, v. DONALD BROOKS, NORMANDY BROOKS, individuals d/b/a B&T Custom Rod & Restoration, and B&T AUTOMOTIVE, INC., a Nevada corporation, Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland


ORDER

This matter arises on the Defendants' Motion to Reopen Discovery for the Limited Purpose of Automobile Insurance [Doc. # 63, filed 3/1/2012] (the "Motion"). I held a hearing on the Motion and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here.

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) The Motion [Doc. # 63] is GRANTED; and

(2) The defendants are granted leave to complete one additional Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of either Grundy Insurance or Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company, at the defendants' election, concerning the insurance policy represented by the declaration page attached as Exhibit A to the Motion. The deposition shall be completed on or before April 20, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

Boyd N. Boland

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Janke v. Brooks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 19, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00837-REB-BNB (D. Colo. Mar. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Janke v. Brooks

Case Details

Full title:TERRY A. JANKE, and MICHELE JANKE. Plaintiffs, v. DONALD BROOKS, NORMANDY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Mar 19, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00837-REB-BNB (D. Colo. Mar. 19, 2012)