From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Janet Leasing Corporation v. Pierre

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Oct 30, 1958
14 Misc. 2d 1066 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)

Opinion

October 30, 1958

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, MAX MELTZER, J.

Frank N. Percaccia and Bernard Meyerson for appellant. Curtis Katz for respondent.


A landlord cannot institute and maintain summary proceedings to evict a statutory tenant in possession of business space, under subdivision (k) of section 8 of the Business Rent Law (L. 1945, ch. 314, as amd.) where the proposed lease permits the landlord to cancel the lease if the new tenant is unable to obtain the consent of the State Liquor Authority for the operation of a restaurant and bar, as such provision does not meet the noncancelable requirements as defined and prescribed in this section.

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and petition dismissed, with costs.

Concur — HOFSTADTER, J.P., AURELIO and TILZER, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Janet Leasing Corporation v. Pierre

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Oct 30, 1958
14 Misc. 2d 1066 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)
Case details for

Janet Leasing Corporation v. Pierre

Case Details

Full title:JANET LEASING CORPORATION, Respondent, v. GILDA DI PIERRE, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Oct 30, 1958

Citations

14 Misc. 2d 1066 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)
180 N.Y.S.2d 113

Citing Cases

Lefcourt Realty Corp. v. Hoffzimer

Without going into a lengthy dissertation on the subject, a reference to a few cases should suffice.…