From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Janes v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Feb 11, 1919
177 P. 626 (Okla. Crim. App. 1919)

Opinion

No. A-3103.

Opinion Filed February 11, 1919.

Appeal from District Court, Garfield County; James B. Cullison, Judge.

Berry Janes and Sarah Trieber were convicted of keeping a place with intent of selling intoxicating liquors, and they appeal. Reversed.

H.J. Sturgis and E.C. Patton, for plaintiff in error.

S.P. Freeling, Atty. Gen., and R. McMillan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


The plaintiffs in error were jointly charged, tried and convicted on an information charging that they did keep a place in the city of Enid with the intent and purpose of selling intoxicating liquors. The jury fixed the punishment of Berry Janes at five years in the penitentiary and a fine of $50, and the punishment of Sarah Trieber at two years in the penitentiary and a fine of $50. An appeal was perfected.

This was a prosecution under section 4, c. 26, Session Laws 1913. The Attorney General has filed a confession of error, on the ground that said statute was, in the case of Proctor v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 338, 176 P. 771, held unconstitutional and void. For the reasons stated in the Proctor Case, the confession of error is sustained, and the judgment herein reversed.


Summaries of

Janes v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Feb 11, 1919
177 P. 626 (Okla. Crim. App. 1919)
Case details for

Janes v. State

Case Details

Full title:BERRY JANES et al. v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Feb 11, 1919

Citations

177 P. 626 (Okla. Crim. App. 1919)
177 P. 626