From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jamil v. TSC Food Serv.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 23, 2022
21 Civ. 9625 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 23, 2022)

Opinion

21 Civ. 9625 (AT)

03-23-2022

ROWSHAN JAMIL, Plaintiff, v. TSC FOOD SERVICE, INC., d/b/a WENDY'S, Defendant.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled in principle. ECF No. 20. Tire above-entitled action is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within sixty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated.

Any application to reopen must be filed within sixty days of this Order: any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jmisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same sixty-day period to be so-ordered by the Court. Per Rule IV(C) of the Court's Individual Practices in Civil Cases, the Court will not retain jmisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record.

Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are vacated. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jamil v. TSC Food Serv.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 23, 2022
21 Civ. 9625 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Jamil v. TSC Food Serv.

Case Details

Full title:ROWSHAN JAMIL, Plaintiff, v. TSC FOOD SERVICE, INC., d/b/a WENDY'S…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 23, 2022

Citations

21 Civ. 9625 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 23, 2022)