From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jami v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 7, 1996
677 So. 2d 972 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-02352.

August 7, 1996.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Robert Doyel, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Wayne S. Melnick, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Stephen D. Ake, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


We reject the appellant's contention that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence and, therefore, affirm his judgment and sentences. We strike, however, the words "and pay for" from condition 8 of appellant's orders of probation. Luby v. State, 648 So.2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We also strike the $33 cost/fine, which was imposed without the citation of statutory authority, without prejudice to the state seeking re-imposition on remand. Coby v. State, 666 So.2d 238 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jami v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 7, 1996
677 So. 2d 972 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Jami v. State

Case Details

Full title:SHAKUR JAMI, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Aug 7, 1996

Citations

677 So. 2d 972 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)