From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Young

U.S.
Jan 1, 1788
1 U.S. 248 (1788)

Opinion

MARCH TERM, 1788.


JUDGMENT being entered by default at the first term, had obtained a rule to shew cause why it should not be opened, upon the affidavit of a third person, that the Defendant was bed-ridden, and that there was a just and conscionable defence.

Todd afterwards opposed the action as grounded upon the affidavit of a third person.

But BY THE COURT: — A third person fully acquainted with the circumstances ought certainly to be admitted to make the affidavit of a defence when the party himself from extreme sickness is incapable of making it; but when he is present, and subject to no disability, it is regularly incumbent upon him to do it. This, however, in a case under very particular circumstances; and the judgment was entered at the first term. We think, therefore, the judgment ought to stand as a security; but that the Defendant must be let into a trial upon an issueable plea.


Summaries of

James v. Young

U.S.
Jan 1, 1788
1 U.S. 248 (1788)
Case details for

James v. Young

Case Details

Full title:JAMES et al. versus YOUNG

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 1, 1788

Citations

1 U.S. 248 (1788)