Opinion
No. 4704.
December 8, 1926.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan; Arthur J. Tuttle, Judge.
Isabel James was convicted of an offense, and she brings error. Affirmed.
Edward N. Barnard, of Detroit, Mich., for plaintiff in error.
David Polasky, of Detroit, Mich. (Delos G. Smith, U.S. Atty., of Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for the United States.
Before DENISON and MOORMAN, Circuit Judges, and HOUGH, District Judge.
Affirmed — as to proof of another offense, on authority of Moore v. U.S., 150 U.S. 57, 61, 14 S. Ct. 26, 37 L. Ed. 996; Tucker v. U.S. (C.C.A. 6) 224 F. 833, 840; De Witt v. U.S. (C.C.A. 6) 291 F. 995, 1002; as to variance affecting the fourth count, on authority of Claassen v. U.S., 142 U.S. 140, 12 S. Ct. 169, 35 L. Ed. 966, and Bullock v. U.S. (C.C.A. 6) 289 F. 29, 31; as to restriction of cross-examination, because within the discretion of the trial judge.