From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Dec 4, 1969
171 S.E.2d 533 (Ga. 1969)

Opinion

25500.

SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 10, 1969.

DECIDED DECEMBER 4, 1969.

Mandamus. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Emeritus Hicks.

William H. James, pro se. Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Tony H. Hight, for appellee.


The appellant has instituted a mandamus proceeding against the State of Georgia, seeking to require that a sentence imposed upon him be changed so as to give him credit for the time he was confined pending an appeal. The trial court refused to issue a rule nisi to the State of Georgia as prayed in the petition, and the appellant brought this appeal. In our view it is not necessary to recite the allegations of the petition.

The proceeding here is an attempt to maintain a suit against the State without its statutory consent, which cannot be done. See in this connection, Peters v. Boggs, 217 Ga. 471 ( 123 S.E.2d 258), and citations. For this reason alone the trial court's disposition was correct.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 10, 1969 — DECIDED DECEMBER 4, 1969.


Summaries of

James v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Dec 4, 1969
171 S.E.2d 533 (Ga. 1969)
Case details for

James v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES v. THE STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Dec 4, 1969

Citations

171 S.E.2d 533 (Ga. 1969)
171 S.E.2d 533

Citing Cases

Crowder v. Department of State Parks

1. This court has consistently held that a suit cannot be maintained against the State without its consent.…

National Dist. Co. v. Dept. of Transp

We cannot agree. As observed in Meadows Motors, the implied waiver rule of Blanton was never adopted by this…