From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. State

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Oct 27, 2011
Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-480 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 27, 2011)

Opinion

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-480

10-27-2011

Robert Anthony James, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Appellate Defender Elizabeth Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Petitioner. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Brian T. Petrano, all of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Richland County

Alison Renee Lee, Circuit Court Judge


AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Elizabeth Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Brian T. Petrano, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : Robert Anthony James appeals the post-conviction relief (PCR) court's order denying his PCR application. He contends trial counsel was ineffective for failing to argue for dismissal of his indictments on the ground the State violated his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: Stepney v. State, 278 S.C. 47, 48, 292 S.E.2d 41, 41 (1982) ("Alleged errors which may be reviewed on direct appeal may not be asserted for the first time in post-conviction proceedings."); Porter v. State, 368 S.C. 378, 383, 629 S.E.2d 353, 356 (2006) ("In order to establish a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a PCR applicant must prove: (1) that counsel failed to render reasonably effective assistance under prevailing professional norms; and (2) that the deficient performance prejudiced the applicant's case."); Smith v. State, 309 S.C. 413, 415, 424 S.E.2d 480, 481 (1992) (holding a petitioner must prove there is "a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different") (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694 (1984))).

AFFIRMED.

FEW, C.J., and THOMAS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

James v. State

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Oct 27, 2011
Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-480 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 27, 2011)
Case details for

James v. State

Case Details

Full title:Robert Anthony James, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Court:THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 27, 2011

Citations

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-480 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 27, 2011)

Citing Cases

James v. State

Defender Association.PER CURIAM: We granted a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of…