From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Rodriques

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Oct 26, 2016
1:16CV1047 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 26, 2016)

Opinion

1:16CV1047

10-26-2016

TERICK MIKE JAMES, Plaintiff, v. MS. RODRIQUES, Defendant(s).


JUDGMENT

The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on September 29, 2016, was served on the parties in this action. No objections were filed within the time limits prescribed by section 636.

The court has reviewed and hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice to the Plaintiff pursuing his claims by seeking relief from or appealing the Judgment in case 1:16CV528.

/s/ Thomas D. Schroeder

United States District Judge October 26, 2016


Summaries of

James v. Rodriques

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Oct 26, 2016
1:16CV1047 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 26, 2016)
Case details for

James v. Rodriques

Case Details

Full title:TERICK MIKE JAMES, Plaintiff, v. MS. RODRIQUES, Defendant(s).

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Date published: Oct 26, 2016

Citations

1:16CV1047 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 26, 2016)