From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Roberts Co., Inc.

Supreme Court, Kings County
Aug 27, 1932
145 Misc. 648 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1932)

Opinion

August 27, 1932.

William E. Lowther, for the motion.

Jesse L. Rosenberg, opposed.


A fence was erected at Canal street and Bowery. Decedent, standing in the highway, was killed by a passing automobile. Plaintiff seeks to hold the builder of the fence on the ground that the obstruction of the sidewalk by defendant was so unreasonable and unnecessary that it amounted to negligence or that the fence was a nuisance. I do not find in the complaint an allegation that decedent was at the point on the highway where he was struck because of the presence of the fence. In other words, he does not say in effect that the existence of the fence, obstructing his reasonable and proper use of the sidewalk as a pedestrian, was the cause of his going, or being forced to go, into the highway. Plaintiff charges that defendant violated its duty in erecting the fence, but he does not connect that alleged act of negligence with the incident that brought about the death of decedent.

Motion granted, without prejudice to plaintiff to amend within twenty days.


Summaries of

James v. Roberts Co., Inc.

Supreme Court, Kings County
Aug 27, 1932
145 Misc. 648 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1932)
Case details for

James v. Roberts Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:STANLEY JAMES, as Administrator, etc., of JOHN JAMES, Deceased, Plaintiff…

Court:Supreme Court, Kings County

Date published: Aug 27, 1932

Citations

145 Misc. 648 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1932)
260 N.Y.S. 144

Citing Cases

Ucciardi v. Bklyn. Health Assn

While it is true that a pleading challenged for legal insufficiency must be construed broadly and liberally…