From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. People

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 23, 2021
2:21-CV-1005-TLN-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-CV-1005-TLN-DMC-P

07-23-2021

RONALD EUGENE JAMES, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court is Petitioner's motion for the appointment of counsel, ECF No. 4.

There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case “if the interests of justice so require.” See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the Court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel, ECF No. 4, is denied without prejudice to renewal, at the earliest, after a response to the petition has been filed.


Summaries of

James v. People

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 23, 2021
2:21-CV-1005-TLN-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2021)
Case details for

James v. People

Case Details

Full title:RONALD EUGENE JAMES, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 23, 2021

Citations

2:21-CV-1005-TLN-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2021)