From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Onelegacy

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jan 16, 2014
CV13-5240 GAF (VBKx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2014)

Opinion

          TAMI DEWELL JAMES, En Pro Se, Carson, CA.


          ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION/NOTICE TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJIDUCE

          GARY A. FEESS, District Judge.

         Comes now the Plaintiff representing her self, undersigned and pursuant to § 1201.29 and Rule 41; requests that the court dismiss this action without prejudice. Plaintiff requests that the Court relieve plaintiff from any monetary responsibility of any costs, including Attorney fees incurred by Defendant as a result of this complaint filed July 19, 2013. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays as follows:

1. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice.

2. That Plaintiff is not held responsible for Defendant's attorney fees and costs incurred in connection with this action.


Summaries of

James v. Onelegacy

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jan 16, 2014
CV13-5240 GAF (VBKx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2014)
Case details for

James v. Onelegacy

Case Details

Full title:TAMI DEWELL JAMES, Plaintiff v. ONELEGACY, Defendant(s).

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jan 16, 2014

Citations

CV13-5240 GAF (VBKx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2014)