From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. N.Y. State Dep't of Corr. & Cmty. Supervision

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 30, 2015
127 A.D.3d 1537 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

04-30-2015

In the Matter of Brian JAMES, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION et al., Respondents.

Brian James, Cape Vincent, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.


Brian James, Cape Vincent, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.

Opinion Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with fighting, violent conduct and creating a disturbance as a result of an altercation with another inmate. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty as charged and that determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

While a review of the hearing transcript demonstrates that the Hearing Officer was often ill-mannered and lacking in professional decorum, we nonetheless confirm. The misbehavior report, related documentation and testimony from the correction officer who investigated the incident provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Fernandez v. Fischer, 110 A.D.3d 1422, 1422, 973 N.Y.S.2d 886 [2013] ; Matter of Leslie v. Fischer, 107 A.D.3d 1264, 1265, 967 N.Y.S.2d 243 [2013] ). Testimony from petitioner and other inmate witnesses that petitioner was not involved in the incident created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Fernandez v. Fischer, 110 A.D.3d at 1423, 973 N.Y.S.2d 886 ; Matter of Mitchell v. Bezio, 69 A.D.3d 1281, 1281–1282, 895 N.Y.S.2d 542 [2010] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

LAHTINEN, J.P., EGAN JR., LYNCH and CLARK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

James v. N.Y. State Dep't of Corr. & Cmty. Supervision

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 30, 2015
127 A.D.3d 1537 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

James v. N.Y. State Dep't of Corr. & Cmty. Supervision

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Brian JAMES, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 30, 2015

Citations

127 A.D.3d 1537 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
5 N.Y.S.3d 924
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 3600

Citing Cases

Ramirez v. Annucci

We confirm. Contrary to petitioner's contention, a review of the record, including the Hearing Officer's…

Sandy v. Venettozzi

The misbehavior report and testimony of its author and of other inmates who were present, as well as…