From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Mehta

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 30, 2012
No. 2:10-cv-1171 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-1171 LKK DAD P

07-30-2012

CHARLES CORNELIUS JAMES, Plaintiff, v. DEEPAK MEHTA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

The parties have submitted to the court a discovery plan. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f). Good cause appearing, the court will set a schedule for this litigation. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The parties shall complete all discovery, and notice for hearing any motions pertaining to discovery, on or before August 31, 2012.

2. The parties shall file any dispositive, non-discovery motions on or before October 31, 2012.

3. The court will set pretrial conference and trial dates, as appropriate, following adjudication of any dispositive motion or the expiration of time for filing such a motion.

_________________

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

James v. Mehta

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 30, 2012
No. 2:10-cv-1171 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2012)
Case details for

James v. Mehta

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES CORNELIUS JAMES, Plaintiff, v. DEEPAK MEHTA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 30, 2012

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-1171 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2012)