From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Md. Div. of Corr.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 26, 2013
538 F. App'x 328 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

08-26-2013

COREY LAMONDE JAMES, Plaintiff - Appellant, and AARON LITTLE FRENCH, Plaintiff, v. MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION; WARDEN BOBBY SHEARIN; CHAPLAIN LAMP, Defendants - Appellees.

Corey Lamonde James, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:11-cv-03301-CCB; 1:11-cv-02142-CCB) Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Corey Lamonde James, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Corey Lamonde James appeals the district court's order granting Defendants summary judgment on his civil rights claims brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006), and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc to 2000cc-5 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. James v. Maryland Div. of Corr., Nos. 1:11-cv-03301-CCB, 1:11-cv-02142-CCB (D. Md. Mar. 15, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

James v. Md. Div. of Corr.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 26, 2013
538 F. App'x 328 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

James v. Md. Div. of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:COREY LAMONDE JAMES, Plaintiff - Appellant, and AARON LITTLE FRENCH…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 26, 2013

Citations

538 F. App'x 328 (4th Cir. 2013)