From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Harris

North Carolina Court of Appeals
Nov 1, 1970
177 S.E.2d 306 (N.C. Ct. App. 1970)

Opinion

No. 7026SC601

Filed 18 November 1970

Appeal and Error 39 — dismissal of appeal — belated docketing of record on appeal Appeal is dismissed for failure of appellant to docket the record on appeal within 90 days after the date of the order appealed from. Rule of Practice No. 5.

APPEAL by plaintiffs from Thornburg, Special Superior Court Judge, April 1970 Civil Non-Jury Session of Superior Court held in MECKLENBURG County.

Gail F. Barber, Jamie Long, and Thomas Wyche for plaintiffs appellants.

No counsel for defendants appellees.


On 30 April 1970 Judge Thornburg denied plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order and for an order to show cause why a temporary restraining order should not be granted. Plaintiffs gave notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals. Plaintiffs' record on appeal was docketed in this court on 1 September 1970. Rule 5 of the Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals requires the record on appeal to be docketed within ninety days after the date of the judgment or order appealed from. In the record before us there is no order extending the time for docketing the record on appeal. For failure to docket the record on appeal within the time allowed by the rules, this appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Judges PARKER and HEDRICK concur.


Summaries of

James v. Harris

North Carolina Court of Appeals
Nov 1, 1970
177 S.E.2d 306 (N.C. Ct. App. 1970)
Case details for

James v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:MRS. JULIA JAMES, MRS. NORA SADLER, MRS. HELEN VANCE, AND MRS. ANNEBELLE…

Court:North Carolina Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 1, 1970

Citations

177 S.E.2d 306 (N.C. Ct. App. 1970)
177 S.E.2d 306

Citing Cases

Phillips v. Wrenn Brothers

The judgment appealed from was entered on 31 August 1970. The record on appeal was docketed in this court on…

King v. Daniels

Rule 5 of the Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals requires that the record on appeal, absent an order…