From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Clark

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 8, 2008
2:06-cv-2911-GEB-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. May. 8, 2008)

Opinion

2:06-cv-2911-GEB-CMK-P.

May 8, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules.

On March 13, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within a specified time. Timely objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 13, 2008, are adopted in full;

2. Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is denied; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file.


Summaries of

James v. Clark

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 8, 2008
2:06-cv-2911-GEB-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. May. 8, 2008)
Case details for

James v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:DONALD HARRY JAMES, Petitioner, v. KEN CLARK, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 8, 2008

Citations

2:06-cv-2911-GEB-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. May. 8, 2008)