From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 16, 2011
11-cv-01359 (BSJ) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 16, 2011)

Opinion

11-cv-01359 (BSJ).

August 16, 2011


Order


After having reviewed Magistrate Judge Katz's Report and Recommendation dated July 12, 2011, and having received no objections thereto, I hereby confirm and adopt the Report in its entirety, having been satisfied that there is no clear error on the face of the record. See King v. Greiner, No. 02 Civ. 5810 (DLC), 2009 WL 2001439, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. July 8, 2009) (citation omitted); see also Wilds v. United Parcel Serv., 262 F. Supp. 2d 163, 169 (S.D.N.Y. 2003). Accordingly, Plaintiff's claims are time barred and the action is dismissed with prejudice.

James' failure to file written objections precludes appellate review of this decision. See Caidor v. Onondaga County, 517 F.3d 601, 604 (2d Cir. 2008).

The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

James v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 16, 2011
11-cv-01359 (BSJ) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 16, 2011)
Case details for

James v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL JAMES, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al. Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 16, 2011

Citations

11-cv-01359 (BSJ) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 16, 2011)