From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Bueno

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Oct 20, 2016
Docket no. 1:16-cv-416-NT (D. Me. Oct. 20, 2016)

Opinion

Docket no. 1:16-cv-416-NT

10-20-2016

MICHAEL JAMES, Plaintiff, v. ERIC BUENO, et al., Defendants


ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On September 23, 2016, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision. The time within which to file objections has expired, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunctive relief is hereby DENIED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Nancy Torresen

United States Chief District Judge Dated this 20th day of October, 2016.


Summaries of

James v. Bueno

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Oct 20, 2016
Docket no. 1:16-cv-416-NT (D. Me. Oct. 20, 2016)
Case details for

James v. Bueno

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL JAMES, Plaintiff, v. ERIC BUENO, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Oct 20, 2016

Citations

Docket no. 1:16-cv-416-NT (D. Me. Oct. 20, 2016)