From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

JAMES v. AUTO LAB DIAGNOSTICS TUNE UP CENTERS

Supreme Court of Michigan
Feb 24, 2006
474 Mich. 1061 (Mich. 2006)

Opinion

No. 128355.

February 24, 2006.


Summary Dispositions.

SC: 128355, COA: 257993.

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we reverse the decision of the Workers' Compensation Appellate Commission because, under the undisputed facts, plaintiff's attendance at the seminar was not an incident of his employment. As a result, plaintiff is not entitled to benefits because his injury on the trip to the seminar did not arise out of and in the course of his employment. Camburn v. Northwest School Dist ( After Remand), 459.Mich 471 (1999).

CAVANAGH, J. I would deny leave to appeal.


I would remand to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted and for the application of Camburn v. Northwest School Dist (After Remand), 459 Mich 471 (1999).


I would deny leave to appeal. The record contains ample facts to support the decision of the magistrate, the Workers' Compensation Appellate Commission, and the Court of Appeals that plaintiff's injury arose out of and in the course of his employment.


Summaries of

JAMES v. AUTO LAB DIAGNOSTICS TUNE UP CENTERS

Supreme Court of Michigan
Feb 24, 2006
474 Mich. 1061 (Mich. 2006)
Case details for

JAMES v. AUTO LAB DIAGNOSTICS TUNE UP CENTERS

Case Details

Full title:JAMES, v. AUTO LAB DIAGNOSTICS TUNE UP CENTERS

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Feb 24, 2006

Citations

474 Mich. 1061 (Mich. 2006)