From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Southern Division
Dec 11, 2009
No. 7:09-CV-15-FL (E.D.N.C. Dec. 11, 2009)

Opinion

No. 7:09-CV-15-FL.

December 11, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before the court on the Memorandum and Recommendation ("M R") of United States Magistrate Judge William A. Webb, regarding the parties' cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings. No objections to the M R have been filed, and the time within which to make any objection has expired. This matter is ripe for ruling.

The court hereby ADOPTS the recommendation of the magistrate judge as its own, and, for the reasons stated therein, plaintiff's motion is GRANTED, defendant's motion is DENIED, and this matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the M R. The clerk of court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

James v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Southern Division
Dec 11, 2009
No. 7:09-CV-15-FL (E.D.N.C. Dec. 11, 2009)
Case details for

James v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:SHARON JAMES, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Southern Division

Date published: Dec 11, 2009

Citations

No. 7:09-CV-15-FL (E.D.N.C. Dec. 11, 2009)

Citing Cases

Winston v. Astrue

The ALJ's failure to meaningfully discuss Winston's obesity conflicts with Social Security Ruling 02-1p and…

Bellamy v. Astrue

Plaintiff also contends that the ALJ failed to consider obesity in conjunction with the other impairments of…