From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 8, 2009
No. CIV S-08-2851 GGH (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-2851 GGH.

December 8, 2009


ORDER


On October 23, 2009, this court issued an order to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to file a summary judgment motion pursuant to the December 17, 2008, scheduling order. On November 12, 2009, plaintiff's counsel filed a response and a summary judgment motion, explaining that due to a seriously impacted caseload, counsel failed to re-calendar the motion. Plaintiff's response is satisfactory.

THEREFORE, the order to show cause, filed October 23, 2009, is discharged.


Summaries of

James v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 8, 2009
No. CIV S-08-2851 GGH (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2009)
Case details for

James v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:BRENTON E. JAMES, JR., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 8, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-08-2851 GGH (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2009)