From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Artis

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 6, 2015
2:13-cv-0886 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2015)

Opinion


CHARLES C. JAMES, Plaintiff, v. D. ARTIS, et al., Defendants. No. 2:13-cv-0886 JAM CKD P United States District Court, E.D. California. March 6, 2015

          ORDER

          JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

         Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

         On January 26, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

         The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. The findings and recommendations filed January 26, 2015, are adopted in full; and

         2. Defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 30) is GRANTED as to plaintiff's equal protection claims and DENIED as to plaintiff's Eighth Amendment outdoor exercise claims against defendants Tucker and Ramirez.


Summaries of

James v. Artis

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 6, 2015
2:13-cv-0886 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2015)
Case details for

James v. Artis

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES C. JAMES, Plaintiff, v. D. ARTIS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 6, 2015

Citations

2:13-cv-0886 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2015)