From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Alessi

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 7, 2023
2:18-cv-01398-JAD-EJY (D. Nev. Aug. 7, 2023)

Opinion

2:18-cv-01398-JAD-EJY

08-07-2023

MELINDA JAMES, Plaintiff, v. DAVID ANTHONY ALESSI, Defendants.


ORDER

ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pending before the Court is David Anthony Alessi and his Attorney Frank C. Gilmore's Joint Response to Order to Show Cause and Why They Should Not be Sanctioned. ECF No 84. Also before the Court is Plaintiff's Response to Show Cause Submissions. ECF No. 86.

The Court also notes that Brett Pilling filed a Response demonstrating why he and his firm should not be sanctioned. ECF No. 83. The Court is satisfied with the explanation; however, counsel is advised that in circumstances where he and his firm no longer represent a party they must withdraw from representation through a formal submission to the Court.

The parties having resolved all differences, and Plaintiff agreeing that obligations to her, as set forth in a prior settlement, have been fulfilled, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties must file a Stipulation and Order to Dismiss this matter with prejudice no later than August 14, 2023.


Summaries of

James v. Alessi

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 7, 2023
2:18-cv-01398-JAD-EJY (D. Nev. Aug. 7, 2023)
Case details for

James v. Alessi

Case Details

Full title:MELINDA JAMES, Plaintiff, v. DAVID ANTHONY ALESSI, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 7, 2023

Citations

2:18-cv-01398-JAD-EJY (D. Nev. Aug. 7, 2023)