From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James D.D. v. Tamela F.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 8, 2013
111 A.D.3d 1337 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-11-8

In the Matter of JAMES D.D., Joseph D., and Wilkins F. Yates County Department of Social Services, Petitioner–Respondent; Tamela F., Respondent–Appellant.

Cara A. Waldman, Fairport, for Respondent–Appellant. Sharon Allen, Attorney for the Children, Naples.



Cara A. Waldman, Fairport, for Respondent–Appellant. Sharon Allen, Attorney for the Children, Naples.
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, SCONIERS AND WHALEN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:

Respondent mother appeals from an order of disposition that brings up for review an order of fact-finding, in which Family Court determined that she neglected the children who are the subject of this proceeding. We affirm. To establish neglect, it was petitioner's burden to “demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence ‘first, that [the] child[ren's] physical, mental or emotional condition has been impaired or is in imminent danger of becoming impaired and second, that the actual or threatened harm to the child[ren] is a consequence of the failure of the parent ... to exercise a minimum degree of care in providing the child[ren] with proper supervision or guardianship’ ” (Matter of Ilona H. [Elton H.], 93 A.D.3d 1165, 1166, 940 N.Y.S.2d 406, quoting Nicholson v. Scoppetta, 3 N.Y.3d 357, 368, 787 N.Y.S.2d 196, 820 N.E.2d 840;seeFamily Ct. Act §§ 1012[f][i][B]; 1046[b][i] ). In determining whether petitioner met its burden, “[w]e must give great deference to [the court]'s assessment of the credibility of the witnesses at the fact-finding hearing,” and we note that the court's decision “ ‘will not be disturbed unless [it] lack[s] a sound and substantial basis in the record’ ” ( Ilona H., 93 A.D.3d at 1166, 940 N.Y.S.2d 406). Here, we conclude that the court's decision has a sound and substantial basis in the record. The undisputed evidence at the hearing established that the mother's husband repeatedly misused alcohol to the point of intoxication ( see § 1046[a][iii] ), and that the harm to the children was causally related to the mother's failure to acknowledge, confront, and adequately address her husband's alcohol abuse and associated aggressive behavior ( see Matter of Kimberly Z. [Jason Z.], 88 A.D.3d 1181, 1183, 1185, 931 N.Y.S.2d 732;Matter of Ian DD., 252 A.D.2d 669, 670, 675 N.Y.S.2d 240;cf. Matter of Tomas E. [Appeal No. 2], 295 A.D.2d 1015, 1019, 745 N.Y.S.2d 800). Finally, the mother failed to preserve for our review her contention that the court erred in requesting an oral report from the Attorney for the Children and, in any event, any alleged error is harmless ( see Matter of Amy L.W. v. Brendan K.H., 37 A.D.3d 1060, 1061, 830 N.Y.S.2d 408).

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.


Summaries of

James D.D. v. Tamela F.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 8, 2013
111 A.D.3d 1337 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

James D.D. v. Tamela F.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMES D.D., Joseph D., and Wilkins F. Yates County…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 8, 2013

Citations

111 A.D.3d 1337 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
111 A.D.3d 1337
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 7353

Citing Cases

Ontario Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. Child Protective Unit v. Jacqueline C. (In re Noah C.)

Furthermore, the subject children found needles in respondents’ home, and a neighbor observed a white powdery…

In re Noah C.

Furthermore, the subject children found needles in respondents' home, and a neighbor observed a white powdery…