From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jamerson v. Crommell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Sep 23, 2019
Case No. 2:16-CV-229 (W.D. Mich. Sep. 23, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 2:16-CV-229

09-23-2019

DAVID L. JAMERSON # 138940, Plaintiff, v. JEFF CROMMELL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On August 14, 2019, Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat issued a Report and Recommendation (R & R) recommending that the Court grant Defendant Crommell's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 41). As noted in the R & R, Plaintiff did not respond to Defendant Crommell's motion and, therefore, failed to present evidence opposing it. On September 4, 2019, this Court entered an Order denying Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to file objections to the R & R because the Court concluded that the time for Plaintiff to gather evidence in response to Defendant Crommell's motion had long passed. (ECF No. 50.)

The R & R was duly served on Plaintiff on August 15, 2019, and Plaintiff has failed to file timely objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the August 15, 2019, Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 46) is approved and adopted as the Opinion of the Court. Defendant Crommell's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 41) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice.

A separate judgment will enter. Dated: September 23, 2019

/s/ Gordon J. Quist

GORDON J. QUIST

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Jamerson v. Crommell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Sep 23, 2019
Case No. 2:16-CV-229 (W.D. Mich. Sep. 23, 2019)
Case details for

Jamerson v. Crommell

Case Details

Full title:DAVID L. JAMERSON # 138940, Plaintiff, v. JEFF CROMMELL, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 23, 2019

Citations

Case No. 2:16-CV-229 (W.D. Mich. Sep. 23, 2019)