From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jakob v. Barnhart

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Dec 14, 2006
Case Number C 00-20763 JF (N.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2006)

Opinion


ROBERT M. JAKOB, Plaintiff, v. JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. No. C 00-20763 JF Re: docket No. 19 United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. December 14, 2006

          ORDER [

          JEREMY FOGEL, District Judge.

         Plaintiff Robert M. Jakob ("Plaintiff") seeks an award of attorney's fees of $18, 309.50. The motion is unopposed. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will grant the motion.

         I. BACKGROUND

         Plaintiff filed the instant action on July 14, 2000, seeking review of an adverse decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Defendant" or "Commissioner"). On April 9, 2002, the Court granted Defendant's motion for summary judgment and dismissed the case. On April 18, 2002, Petitioner filed a notice of appeal. On November 22, 2002, following stipulation by the parties, the action was remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. On December 23, 2002, the Court issued a stipulated order granting Plaintiff attorney's fees of $4, 500.00 under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA").

         On November 3, 2006, Plaintiff moved for an award of attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Plaintiff represents in his motion and accompanying exhibits that subsequent to the remand, an Administrative Law Judge issued a favorable decision for Plaintiff on June 23, 2006. See Motion Ex. A. On November 3, 2006, the Social Security Administration calculated past due benefits of $89, 238.00, and withheld $22, 309.50 for attorney's fees. See Motion Ex. B. This withholding is equivalent to the amount agreed to in Plaintiff's agreement with counsel, see Motion Ex. B., and represents the percentage approved by the Social Security Administration. See Motion Ex. A. Of this $22, 309.50, Plaintiff seeks $4, 000.00 in a separate motion at the administrative level. Plaintiff's counsel seeks the remaining $18, 309.50 for appearances before this Court. Counsel states in the motion that he would reimburse Plaintiff the $4, 500 previously paid in accordance with the EAJA, for a net cost to Plaintiff of $13, 809.50.

The agreement provides: "I will pay Harvey P. Sackett, subject to the approval of the Social Security Administration, a fee no greater than 25% of the gross past-due benefits owed to me (and my auxiliary beneficiaries, if applicable)."

         II. LEGAL STANDARD

         In an action for past due benefits under 42 U.S.C. § 406, "the court may determine and allow as part of its judgment a reasonable fee for such representation, not in excess of 25 percent of the total of the past-due benefits to which the claimant is entitled by reason of such judgment." 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A). "§ 406(b) does not displace contingent-fee agreements as the primary means by which fees are set for successfully representing Social Security benefits claimants in court. Rather, § 406(b) calls for court review of such arrangements as an independent check, to assure that they yield reasonable results in particular cases." Gisbrecht v. Barnhart , 535 U.S. 789, 807 (2002).

         III. DISCUSSION

         The Court concludes that the attorney's fees sought by Plaintiff's counsel are reasonable within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A) and Gisbrecht . Plaintiff's counsel declares that he spent 30.35 hours working on the merits of this action in this Court. See Motion Ex. D. Such an amount of time is reasonable given the complexity of the case. The effective hourly rate of $603.28 is reasonable considering the contingent nature of the representation, counsel's non-contingent rate of $475.00, and the experience and skill of counsel.

$18, 309.50 divided by 30.35 hours.

         Counsel already has received $4, 500.00 in fees under the EAJA, and any award under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) must be reduced by that amount. Gisbrecht , 535 U.S. at 796. Accordingly, the Court orders that Plaintiff's counsel be allowed to collect attorney's fees in the amount of $18, 309.50 under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), and that counsel shall reimburse Plaintiff the $4, 500.00 already received pursuant to the EAJA.

         IV. ORDER

         Good cause therefor appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's application for attorney's fees is GRANTED.


Summaries of

Jakob v. Barnhart

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Dec 14, 2006
Case Number C 00-20763 JF (N.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2006)
Case details for

Jakob v. Barnhart

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT M. JAKOB, Plaintiff, v. JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner, Social…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Dec 14, 2006

Citations

Case Number C 00-20763 JF (N.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2006)

Citing Cases

Harrell v. Berryhill

See Goucher, 2017 WL 3421845, at *4 (listing cases). See Pauer v. Berryhill, 2018 WL 3429083, at *2 (N.D.…

Goucher v. Colvin

There were two cases (from 2010 and 2006) where Sackett was awarded a de facto hourly rate in the $600 range…